Conflict with Dividing Assets
Jordan and Ivy were married for fifteen years, united by love and a shared vision. Together, they built a successful supermarket in a small Queensland town, pouring in countless hours and unwavering dedication to turn it into a community cornerstone. However, as the demands of running the business intensified, their relationship began to suffer. Disagreements over business decisions became frequent, spilling into their personal lives and ultimately leading to their separation.
After deciding to part ways, Jordan and Ivy faced the difficult task of dividing their assets, especially the supermarket they had both invested so much in. Jordan, feeling burnt out and ready to move on, wanted to sell his share of the business, while Ivy, with a deep connection to the supermarket, was determined to keep it. Unable to reach a decision on their own, they turned to family law professionals for guidance.
Reaching a Legal Conclusion
Their lawyers presented two main options: Consent Orders or a Financial Agreement. Consent Orders would make their property settlement legally binding and enforceable by the court, offering security and finality. On the other hand, a Financial Agreement could be completed without court involvement, providing flexibility, though it wouldn’t have the same level of enforceability.
After weighing their options, Jordan and Ivy opted for Consent Orders. The court’s oversight and the legally binding nature of Consent Orders provided reassurance that the settlement would be fair. This arrangement allowed Ivy to continue managing the supermarket while giving Jordan the freedom to start fresh. With Consent Orders in place, both felt they could move forward confidently, with a clear and stable financial path.